FARO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of -5.67%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.43%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $180.43 which suggests that it could grow by 9.3%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.72%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is higher than Keysight Technologies's net income of -$73M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 47.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.75x versus 5.81x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 626.22%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.75x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.66%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.21%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 123.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.75x versus 18.04x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 4.64%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $85.27 which suggests that it could grow by 16.74%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.491%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble's PE ratio is 83.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.75x versus 4.89x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.